Cecil Lee

Related: Is a squarish or narrow layout better for an office unit What key factors should I consider Does this also apply to homes - Feng Shui for Business - FengShui.Geomancy.Net

CECIL PLACECECIL PLACE is a Freehold development located at 137 Cecil Street in D01 - Boat Quay / Raffles Place of Singapore. The development is brought to you by Cecil Pte Ltd. CECIL PLACE comprises a total of 30 units. CECIL PLACE is targeted to be completed in 30/03/2027

HDB Lease Decay By 2030, nearly 500,000 HDB flats will be more than 40 years old—around 40% of the stock. As flats age, the key issue is lease decay: a shorter remaining lease can lower valuation support, tighten financing/CPF usability, and reduce resale demand, especially as buyers become more sensitive to lease length. Advice for Current Owners If you own an older flat, the most important factor to watch is the remaining time on your lease, not just the physical age of the building. Because older flats can be harder to sell and generally face drops in value, it is smart to plan your exit strategy early. If you plan to move soon, avoid spending a lot of money on renovations, as you likely won't get that investment back when you sell. Additionally, you should not base your financial plans on the hope of government redevelopment or upgrading schemes, as these are never guaranteed. Advice for Buyers and the Market Outlook If you are looking to buy an older resale flat, checking the remaining lease is crucial. Older flats generally do not go up in price as quickly as newer ones, so it is vital to buy a property with strong selling points, such as being close to public transport and having good amenities. Buyers should also be aware that as the population ages, a larger number of older flats will be put up for sale by elderly owners or their children. This increase in supply will create more competition and make it harder to sell older properties in the future. Understanding the Lease "Danger Zones" The biggest challenge with aging flats is how the remaining lease affects a buyer's ability to get bank loans and use their CPF (retirement savings). Buyers generally start getting cautious when a flat hits about 60 years of remaining lease. The golden rule is the "age-95 rule": if the remaining lease lasts until the youngest buyer turns 95, they can use their CPF freely. If it doesn't, their CPF usage is restricted, making the flat much harder to afford. The financial risk jumps significantly when a lease drops below 50 years, and once it falls below 20 years, CPF cannot be used at all, making the flat very difficult to sell.

Check with you. Is this design acceptable: The overhead beams These beams: Master Cecil Lee: In my view, at least 7 out of 10 Chinese people don’t like overhead beams. And if you have several visitors making unfriendly remarks about it, it’s understandable that someone might feel upset. And also, if you mentioned that your FS master says it’s okay… I really have no choice but to deny that I ever said I was “okay” with it. Honestly, your ceiling is already about 2.5 metres, and beams like that can be quite an eyesore. If they are truly heavy beams… then I’d really pray that the upstairs neighbour—if they ever do major hacking—doesn’t end up bringing down the beam. We definitely don’t want another "Hotel New World" happening in a home (touch-wood). Where if they are actual beams, drop down and hurt someone. +++ The Hotel New World collapse (also known as the Lian Yak Building collapse) was a major structural disaster in Singapore. - When/where: On 15 March 1986, the six‑storey mixed‑use building at 142 Serangoon Road (near Rochor) collapsed suddenly, around midday. - What happened: The building came down almost completely, trapping people in the rubble. The ground floor housed businesses (including a nightclub), and the upper floors were used as a hotel. - Casualties: 33 people died and 17 were injured. - Rescue effort: A large, multi‑agency rescue operation ran for days; several survivors were pulled out from voids in the debris, but many victims were trapped deep inside. - Cause (official finding): Investigations concluded the collapse resulted from fundamental structural design errors—most notably the building was underdesigned for its actual loads because the engineer’s calculations omitted key loads/weight (including the building’s own dead load), leaving the structure with inadequate strength. - Aftermath/impact: The incident led to significant tightening of building design checks, regulatory oversight, and professional accountability, and became a landmark case shaping Singapore’s modern building safety regime. Short timeline — rescue and investigation (Hotel New World / Lian Yak Building collapse) - 15 Mar 1986 (midday) — The six‑storey building at 142 Serangoon Road collapses suddenly, trapping occupants and bystanders. - 15 Mar 1986 (same day) — Singapore Civil Defence Force (then Civil Defence), Police, SAF units, and other agencies begin a large-scale search-and-rescue operation. The site is stabilised; rescuers work in shifts using heavy equipment and hand tools to avoid further collapse. - 15–16 Mar 1986 — Survivors are located and pulled out from pockets within the rubble (voids). The operation continues around the clock, balancing speed with safety. - Following days (late Mar 1986) — The rescue shifts gradually from finding live survivors to recovery, as chances of survival diminish and access remains difficult. - After rescue phase (1986) — A formal inquiry/investigation begins. Authorities and engineers collect design drawings, calculation sheets, material information, and site evidence; they also interview parties involved in the building’s design and construction. - Investigation findings (1986–1987 period) — The inquiry concludes the collapse was due to critical structural design/calculation errors, with the building significantly underdesigned for the loads it had to carry. - Aftermath (late 1980s onward) — Singapore implements tighter checking/approval processes and professional practice safeguards (including stronger requirements around independent design checking and regulatory scrutiny).

AD

ADs

20 Tung Po Avenue

Site Map

Villas @ Greenbank Park Villas @ Greenbank Park is a freehold development located at 50 and 52 Greenbank Park (semi-detached) and 54 Greenbank Park (bungalow) in District 21, Clementi / Upper Bukit Timah, Singapore. The development is by Tong Eng Brothers Pte Ltd. Villas @ Greenbank Park has a total of 3 units. Villas @ Greenbank Park is planned to be completed on 30/03/2026.

District 27 - Sembawang / Yishun 1 Villa Bungalow & 10 Semi-detached homes Vila Natura Vila Natura is a freehold development located at 20 Tung Po Avenue in District 27 - Sembawang / Yishun of Singapore. The development is by Aurum Gravis. Vila Natura has a total of 11 units. Vila Natura is expected to be completed on 30/01/2029.

Expensive legal battle for woman who listed her daughter as co-owner of 26 properties The Straits Times (March 29, 2026) - What happened: A Singapore mother added her daughter as a joint owner on 26 private properties. A dispute later arose over whether the daughter was entitled to a share of those assets. - The daughter’s claim: The daughter argued she was meant to receive an equal/half share of the properties and that her mother had promised this. - The mother’s position: The mother said the daughter’s name was added mainly for administrative convenience (e.g., handling property matters), not as a gift of beneficial ownership. The mother had funded the purchases and made key decisions. - Key legal rule applied: The article highlights the Civil Law Act principle that a trust/declaration of beneficial interest in land must be in writing. Without written proof, it is difficult to show that someone who is on title was (or wasn’t) meant to hold a beneficial share on trust. - Court outcome (as reported): The mother succeeded, and the daughter lost the claim because she could not prove the alleged promise/beneficial entitlement under the required legal standard. The case resulted in significant legal costs. - Practical takeaways: - Don’t add someone as joint owner unless you truly intend to share the asset. - If you want help managing assets, consider alternatives (e.g., powers of attorney/clear agency arrangements) rather than changing legal ownership. - Keep clear written documentation of intentions; who pays and how payments are recorded can strongly affect ownership disputes. +++ Source & Credit

On 31st March 2026

First and only?

Sales ad in 2026 showing a similar design where privacy windows are on the lower part of the windows. Above them are sliding window panels.

AN EXAMINATION OF WHICH FLYING STAR PERIOD ONE SHOULD UTILIZE? +++ Which Flying Star Period to Use? For example, take a look at Treasure @ Tampines The transition of Feng Shui Qi is significant in the context of the Chinese New Year 2024, as it influences the energy dynamics within a space. The timing of when a unit is first occupied plays a crucial role in determining its Flying Star Feng Shui. This means that the specific day of occupancy will affect the energetic quality and overall Feng Shui of the unit, highlighting the importance of timing in Feng Shui practices. Understanding these elements can help individuals optimize their living environments in alignment with the changing energies associated with the New Year. +++ When did the first owner/resident/tenant take residence in the unit at Treasure @ Tampines? +++ EITHER Can be the owner, resident or a tenant OR Can be the owner, resident or a tenant REGARDLESS, UNITS FACING NORTH POSSESS A POSITIVE FENG SHUI OVERALL How do you Feng Shui your home? Use your front door? Who are the Conservatives & the Modernist? +++ Cecil Lee, Geomancy.net

Flying Star Feng Shui Workings

Facts of this case A costly lawsuit over a failed “99-1” property ownership arrangement underscores that attempts to circumvent Singapore’s ABSD face heightened IRAS scrutiny, making strict compliance, responsible professional advice, and verified legal/tax guidance essential to avoid severe financial and legal consequences.Tourist Destinations A RED FLAG +++ Key Takeaways - “99-1” and similar structures aimed at avoiding ABSD are increasingly treated as tax avoidance, not a “gray area.” - Non-compliance can trigger major losses, including expensive litigation (S$731,212 in this case). - Advisors (agents/lawyers) have a duty to prioritize clients’ long-term interests and clearly disclose risks. - Property strategies should be validated with independent legal and tax advice, not just sales assurances. - Deals that appear to offer easy savings warrant extra scrutiny and multiple opinions. - Integrity and transparency are framed as the safest foundation for sustainable real estate decisions. - Authorities’ tougher enforcement raises the cost-benefit risk of “creative” structuring versus full compliance. +++ Source & Credit: ABSD is a form of stamp duty administered by IRAS under the Stamp Duties Act, so “ABSD non‑compliance” is typically dealt with through (i) recovery of the duty shortfall and (ii) statutory penalties, and in more serious cases (iii) criminal enforcement. IRAS can re-characterise the deal and raise an assessment if IRAS considers the transaction structure does not reflect the true beneficial owner (or is intended to avoid ABSD), it can disregard the form of the arrangement and assess ABSD based on the actual purchaser/beneficial owner. IRAS may then issue a Notice of Assessment for the ABSD shortfall, sometimes together with other stamp duty shortfalls (e.g., BSD) where relevant. You may have to pay the ABSD shortfall plus penalties. Stamp duty is generally due within 14 days of signing (if signed in Singapore) or 30 days (if signed overseas). Late stamping/late payment can attract penalties commonly, up to 3 months late: S$10 or the duty (whichever is higher); more than 3 months late: S$25 or 4× the duty (whichever is higher). Where ABSD was underpaid due to insufficient duty/under-declaration, IRAS can require payment of the shortfall and may impose additional civil penalties that can, in serious cases, be multiples of the duty (including up to 4× in certain situations), depending on the nature of the failure and enforcement approach. Remissions/refunds can be denied or clawed back. If an ABSD remission or refund was granted or sought on conditions later found not to be met, IRAS can reject the claim or recover the refunded ABSD, potentially with penalties where the underlying duty position was non-compliant or documents were not properly stamped. Criminal and practical consequences can follow. Where conduct involves fraud, false statements, sham documents, or intentional evasion, IRAS may investigate and refer the matter for prosecution, with outcomes potentially including substantial fines and, in the most serious cases, imprisonment. Separately, non-compliance often causes “knock-on” issues such as transaction delays, banks/solicitors pausing or reassessing deals if beneficial ownership is unclear, civil disputes and legal costs, and reputational/professional risks for involved advisors.

To be frank, it appears quite tidy, organized, and is regarded positively. In comparison to numerous other corridors, this is already an advantage. Nevertheless, these aspects are deemed superficial and do not consider the location, the terrain, and the orientation of this residence.

Project / launch - Project name: Tengah Garden Residences - Developer(s): Hong Leong Holdings, GuocoLand, CSC Land - **Preview start date:** Saturday, Apr 11 - **Notable positioning:** First private residential project with retail offerings launched in Tengah; also described as the first private project in the precinct Development specs - Total units: 863 - Unit types: 1- to 4-bedroom apartments - Building configuration: Nine 16-storey blocks/towers Pricing (starting) - Prices from S$1,779 psf - 1-bedroom: 484 sq ft, from S$980,000 (**S$2,025 psf**) - 2-bedroom: from 624 sq ft, from S$1.11 million (**S$1,779 psf**) - 3-bedroom: from 797 sq ft, from S$1.59 million (**S$1,993 psf**) - 4-bedroom: from 1,130 sq ft, from S$2.29 million (**S$2,025 psf**) Unit mix - 1-bedroom: 6 units (less than 1%) - 2-bedroom: ~**39%** - 3-bedroom: ~**40%** - 4-bedroom: ~**20%** Land / acquisition - **Site area:** 274,028 sq ft - Location: along Tengah Garden Avenue - **Land price:** S$675 million - **Land rate:** S$821 psf per plot ratio (psf ppr) - **Purchase timing:** January 2025 Tengah Garden Residences Site Plan

Pinery Residences on 28th March 2026 92% sold (ongoing, as of 8pm) from ~$2,546 psf +++ Source & Credits:

AD Says Tengah Residences Preview Date: 𝟭𝟭 𝗔𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗹 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 Tengah Garden Residences is not just another project. It’s part of Singapore’s Smart & Eco Town of the future. What buyers will be buying into: 🌳 100m Forest Corridor & Green Spaces 🚶‍♂️ Car-Free Town Centre Lifestyle ☀️ Solar Powered Common Areas 🏡 Smart Home Living ♻️ Automated Waste Collection 🚗 EV-Ready Parking 🚆 Seamless Transport Connectivity This is the Tengah Vision. Smart Living • Green Spaces • Sustainable Future